Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:33

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Scientists Stunned by Evidence of Ancient Birds Nested in the Arctic - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Is there any new American thing?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s the best way to get over someone you love?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Tomato Recall Escalates to Highest Health Risk Alert—Here’s What You Need to Know - Real Simple
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Older Americans are happiest living in these 5 US states, study says — is yours one of them? - Yahoo
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Why some allergy experts want this popular group of drugs to go away - Deseret News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.